In an environment where market conditions can shift quickly and traditional borrowing routes may be less competitive or slower to access, Medium Term Note (MTN) programmes have become an increasingly attractive option for institutions with substantial funding requirements. They provide borrowers with a flexible and efficient means of raising debt in the capital markets, offering the ability to access a wide investor base, issue debt in multiple tranches, and tailor maturities to specific funding needs.
An MTN programme provides a pre-arranged framework that enables a borrower to issue notes quickly, without the need to prepare full documentation for every issuance. Once the programme is in place, individual series of notes can be brought to market efficiently, making it a valuable tool for large-scale borrowing or refinancing.
Establishing an MTN programme is a structured process that typically takes around 8–12 weeks to complete. Borrowers first appoint legal counsel and a lead arranger, usually a bank, to advise on the structuring of the programme, prepare the necessary documentation, and coordinate investor engagement. At the same time, a public credit rating is sought from an agency such as Moody’s or S&P, providing investors with an independent assessment of creditworthiness; this process, which often takes 4–6 weeks, usually runs in parallel with the preparation of legal documentation. The documentation includes a base prospectus, setting out the overarching terms under which future notes can be issued. Once complete, the prospectus must be submitted for regulatory approval, which can add a further one to two weeks before the programme is ready for use.
Once established, subsequent issuance from the MTN programme can typically be completed in 5–10 working days, depending on market conditions and investor demand.
MTN programmes are most cost-effective for borrowers looking to issue £100 million or more, either in a single transaction or across multiple drawdowns. Notes can be issued in various currencies and maturities, from as short as one year to as long as 50 years, depending on investor appetite and borrower requirements. For longer terms and larger amounts, borrowers may consider sourcing funding under a bond programme rather than an MTN. The choice will depend on the likelihood of requiring additional drawdowns during the term, as opposed to receiving all of the funding upfront.
Another key advantage is flexibility: borrowers can issue fixed or floating rate debt. Floating rate notes are often linked to benchmarks such as SONIA (Sterling Overnight Index Average), providing close alignment with short-term interest rate movements. Alternatively, fixed rate tranches can be used to lock in borrowing costs for longer periods.
For well-rated borrowers with substantial funding needs, an MTN programme offers a cost-effective and highly flexible route to market. It enables access to a broad pool of investors, competitive pricing across maturities, and the ability to act quickly when market conditions are favourable. However, it requires upfront investment in legal, rating, and advisory fees, and is best suited to borrowers with recurring or large-scale debt requirements. Effective use of an MTN programme also relies on careful market timing and proactive investor engagement, both of which are essential to securing competitive pricing and strong demand for new issuance.
Related Insights
Reduce Risk with Secured Deposits